University Textbooks of Theology: Lexical Features in Relation to Academic Theological Papers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15290/elpis.2021.23.06

Keywords:

university textbooks of theology, academic works of theology, scientific-educational substyle, functional stylistics, theolinguistics

Abstract

The style characteristic of scientific works of theology differs greatly from the scientific style of other fields of science, but it also shows many common characteristics and similarities with them. The specific methodology of theology as well as the peculiarities of its scientific knowledge inevitably affect the extralinguistic and intralinguistic features of theological scientific works. The lexical layer of language is the most prominent representative of each field of science individually, and of the theology as well. This paper deals with the issue of the specific features of the linguistic level of university textbooks of theology. In the analysis of the mentioned problem the author has conducted and applied the results of the statistical analysis of the representative corpus of the university textbooks and academic works of theology, and, where possible and necessary, the contrastive analysis has been applied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayto, J. (2005). Dictionary of Word Origins. London: A&C Black. [online] https://epdf.pub/word-origins3614fb1227e6bc66395f8df79e544a3691633.html, [19.09.2020]

Burkett, D. (2002). An Introduction to the New Testament and the Origins of Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chadwick, H. (2003). The Church in the Ancient Society: From Galilee to Gregory the Great. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Collins English Dictionary. (1991). Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers.

Concise Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. (2000). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunn, J. D. G. (2003). The Cambridge Companion to St Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gumovskaâ, G. (2008). LSP: English for Professional Communication: Anglijskij âzyk professionalʹnogo obŝeniâ. Moskva: Aspekt Press.

Knežević, I. i Ranković, Z. (2015). Naučni stil i žanrovi naučnih radova u oblasti teologije. Komunikacija i kultura online, 6. Beograd. 46-58. https://www.komunikacijaikultura.org/index.php/kk/article/view/63

Kristal, D. (1987). Kembrička enciklopedija jezika. Beograd: Nolit.

Meyendorff, J. (1982). The Byzantine Legacy in the Orthodox Church. New York: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.

Schmemann, A. (1974). Of Water and the Spirit. New York: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.

Stanoǰčić, Ž. i Popović, L̂. (2008). Gramatika srpskog ǰezika. Beograd: Zavod za ud̂benike.

Ricks, E. A Short Glossary of Obsolete Words in the King James New Testament [online] https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/new-era/1977/04/a-short-glossary-of-obsolete-words-in-the-king-jamesnew-testament?lang=eng, [27.09.2020]

Tarazi, P. N. (1999). The New Testament: An Introduction. New York: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-23

How to Cite

Knežević, I. (2021). University Textbooks of Theology: Lexical Features in Relation to Academic Theological Papers. Elpis, (23), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.15290/elpis.2021.23.06

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)